| p53 Database |
|
|
|
p53 Structures |
|
|
|
Mammals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
© 2007 IBI Biosolutions Pvt. Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
Human beings
, are bipedal primates belonging to the mammalian species
Homo sapiens (Latin: "wise man"
or "knowing man") in the family Hominidae (the great apes).
Compared to other living organisms on Earth, humans have a highly
developed brain capable of abstract reasoning, language, and introspection.
This mental capability, combined with an erect body carriage that
frees their upper limbs for manipulating objects, has allowed humans
to make far greater use of tools than any other species. Humans
originated in Africa about 200,000 years ago, but they now
inhabit every continent, with a total population of over 6.6 billion
as of 2007.
|
|
|
Like most primates,
humans are social by nature; however, humans are particularly adept
at utilizing systems of communication for self-expression, the exchange
of ideas, and organization. Humans create complex social structures
composed of cooperating and competing groups, ranging in scale from
small families and partnerships to species-wide political, scientific
and economic unions. Social interactions between humans have also
established an extremely wide variety of traditions, rituals, ethics,
values, social norms, and laws which form the basis of human society.
Humans also have a marked appreciation for beauty and aesthetics
which, combined with the human desire for self-expression, has led
to cultural innovations such as art, literature and music.
|
|
Humans are also
noted for their desire to understand and influence the world around
them, seeking to explain and manipulate natural phenomena through
science, philosophy, mythology and religion. This natural curiosity
has led to the development of advanced tools and skills; humans
are the only known species to build fires, cook their food, clothe
themselves, and use numerous other technologies.
|
|
Most researchers
currently accept the statement that "modern" humans can
be considered to date to approximately 200-250 kyr. Others (such
as Milford Wolpoff), take the view that our species extends as far
as approximately 2.0 myr, subsuming H. erectus , H.
ergaste r, and H. heidelbergensis . There are two
polarizing camps on the issue of our species origin (though there
is varying degrees of compromise between the two stances as well
as various alternative positions): the multiregional (or continuity)
camp, and the Out of Africa (replacement) camp.
|
The perspective of multiregionalists is that extending
to the origin of H. erectus , there have been populations
of humans living around the old world, and these all contributed
to successive generations, eventually leading to modern humans.
In this scenario, the Chinese and Indonesian material are the
most direct ancestors of modern East Asians, the African material
are the most direct ancestors of modern Africans, and that either
the European populations are the most direct ancestors of modern
Europeans, or that the European populations contributed significant
genetic material to modern Europeans, with most of modern Europeans
origins rooted in Africa or West Asia. Adherents to this model
look at early material and try to trace continuity in morphology
from those early populations to later populations in the same
geographic area. In this model, there are paralleled changes in
all penecontemporary populations, with enough genetic migration
to maintain close species bonds, while still allowing the suite
of racial features we see today.
|
|
The perspective
of the Out of Africa model (often called Out of Africa II, referring
to a second migration from Africa of a hominid population) adherents
is that when there was a migration of H. erectus out of
Africa into Asia and Europe, these populations (seen in materials
like the Chinese and Indonesian erectus ) did not contribute
a significant amount of genetic material to later populations that
led to modern humans (some claim no genetic ancestry to these groups
and their descendants at all, a "strict" replacement model).
At approximately 200 kya there was a second migration of hominids
out of Africa . This time it was fully modern H. sapiens ,
which proceeded to replace whatever populations that then occupied
Asia and Europe . Some see direct competition and extermination
of the native populations, some see passive replacement due to better
adaptive strategies, and some see genetic admixture with the preponderance
of genetic material coming from the incoming human populations,
eventually replacing and assimilating them into the greater collective.
In this view there is a specific speciation event that occurred
which led to the origin of H. sapiens in Africa , and
this population is the forerunner of modern humans, leaving the
European Neanderthals, Chinese erectus , and others out
in the cold.
|
|
There are various
models which embody combinations of these ideas, different "strict"
interpretations of the two theories, etc. Multiregionalists look
for similarities between populations in the same geographic location
that are separated spatially, while people who follow replacement
look for differences. It is oft a difference of semantics between
different interpretations rather than real differences of opinion,
but often there is real disagreement on the validity of research,
and theoretical interpretations. This has led to some fairly severe
strife within the paleoanthropological community, with potshots
often taken unfairly at rival theories and rival theoreticians.
For example, multiregionalism is often portrayed as a racist theory
that claims different "races" have evolved to different
"levels" of intelligence. Out of Africa II has often been
portrayed as a religiously motivated idea that tries to come to
terms with the biblical story of Genesis, as reference to the "Eve"
theory suggests.
|
|
Beyond disagreement
over fundamental issues like "What is a valid speciation event?"
one fact stands out: neither theory has proved itself above the
other in terms of parsimonious explanation of the fossil evidence.
The general opinion among researchers seems to go in cycles, supporting
OoA, then supporting MRE, then supporting OoA, etc. Currently, we
seem to be at a cusp of support for replacement, and there seems
top be a shifting in opinion more favorable to continuity. The highly
publicized genetic studies that purportedly "proved" that
Neanderthals did not contribute the modern human genome are so plagued
with practical and theoretical problems to make their conclusions
moot, especially since it does not in any way address the rest of
the populations in the world, and their genetic fate.
|
|
Humans are an eukaryotic
species. Each diploid cell has two sets of 23 chromosomes, each
set received from one parent. There are 22 pairs of autosomes and
one pair of sex chromosomes. By present estimates, humans have approximately
20,000 – 25,000 genes. Like other mammals, humans have an XY sex-determination
system, so that females have the sex chromosomes XX and males have
XY. The X chromosome is larger and carries many genes not on the
Y chromosome, which means that recessive diseases associated with
X-linked genes, such as hemophilia, affect men more often than women.
|
 |
|
Role of p53 gene in homo sapiens
|
|
Acts as a tumor
suppressor in many tumor types; induces growth arrest or apoptosis
depending on the physiological circumstances and cell type. Involved
in cell cycle regulation as a trans-activator that acts to negatively
regulate cell division by controlling a set of genes required for
this process. One of the activated genes is an inhibitor of cyclin-dependent
kinases. Apoptosis induction seems to be mediated either by stimulation
of BAX and FAS antigen expression, or by repression of Bcl-2 expression.
|
 |
|
Mutations of the
gene encoding p53, a 53-kilodalton cellular protein, are found frequently
in human tumor cells, suggesting a crucial role for this gene in
human oncogenesis. To model the stepwise mutation or loss of both
p53 alleles during tumorigenesis, a human osteosarcoma cell line,
Saos-2, was used that completely lacked endogenous p53. Single copies
of exogenous p53 genes were then introduced by infecting cells with
recombinant retroviruses containing either point-mutated or wild-type
versions of the p53 cDNA sequence. Expression of wild-type p53 suppressed
the neoplastic phenotype of Saos-2 cells, whereas expression of
mutated p53 conferred a limited growth advantage to cells inthe
absence of wild-type p53. Wild-type p53 was phenotypically dominant
to mutated p53 in a two-allele configuration. These results suggest
that, as with the retinoblastoma gene, mutation of both alleles
of the p53 gene is essential for its role in oncogenesis.
|
|